Uploading Fanart That Isnt Yours Is Plagrims

September 20th, 2018

WARNING: this weblog is classified

as D/O a.k.a. Discussion/Opinion.

Greetings hooman,

This is your Potato.

Today, I won't prove y'all another doodle, no no no, I will FiNaLLy go on my promise (afterwards 1 year yeaaah-) and discuss a topic that has been viewed and reviewed AND RE-REVIEWED:

Fake Art and Fine art theft.

Rebecca, please turn on some ambient music

Considering this problem has existed on ARA for a loooooooong time, I'g not surprised anymore seeing them while I'yard scrolling down the fanart feed, the recent posts, or even the nomination page. Nonetheless, information technology's non considering they exist everyday that we should allow them practise everything they want. Therefore we will discuss the following questions:

-What's a Fanart?

-What is (and what's not) Art theft? Faux Art?

-Co-existing in ARA: What tin can you lot do as a member of this community?

ೋ❀❀ೋ═══ ↓ ═══ೋ❀❀ೋ

Alarm: It's a discussion blog, then I'm counting on yous to Respond these questions by yourself. There are many things written in this blog that need to be discussed, some points are blurry on purpose, and later on two weeks of reflection I myself have a unlike mindset on some things. In that location is and then much sodium in it that it looks more like a rant weblog :') I was going to delete this draft just I recollect information technology is still interesting and afterward all it'south a proof that I'm alive huehuehue

Feel free to discuss the topic in the comments, anybody has their ain opinion and a different point of view nearly definitions, concepts and advices. Please respect other people'southward opinion. Share your experience and your thoughts. Collaborate with other hoomans. Be socially active in one case a yr.

ೋ❀❀ೋ═══ ↑ ═══ೋ❀❀ೋ

Since it's 3am and I'm lonely writing this blog while you are animate somewhere on this planet, I shall start first, right?

Art

substantive • /ɑːt/

1-The expression or application of human artistic skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such equally painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.

Art. 2018. In

Oxford Living Dictionaries

Retrieved September three, 2018, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/art

────────── ·  ·  ·  · ✦

As well as Beauty and Dear are not unproblematic nouns you could define at ease, the definition of Fine art tin exist variable because its several uses in the common language nowadays. Is Art only a finished product, with a adamant sense/emotional response?

Art can be a form of expression not only for the artist, but also for the people who look at it. Information technology implies a sender-receiver human relationship between the artist and the audience, a message that tin be received differently co-ordinate to everyone'south interpretation. Equally artists do receive their own message and feel the emotions they tried to depict, they are really themselves part of the audition too. Just the dazzler of an artwork and the emotional power it evocates is all the same subjective to anyone. Thus everything can exist Fine art if someone want information technology to be, whether information technology's the will of the artist or not.

Nevertheless, Art is more than but a subjective 'language': it is a self-estimation of the world that is affected by your experience, your interests and your emotions. Art, is creating the world you live in through your point of view. It is transforming the reality and making information technology your ain with your imagination. Therefore, to create, you have to be inspired by something else; a person, an object, a feeling, a style, basically annihilation that has already existed or is still living for you. No artist has ever created an artwork from zippo. To create, you need a basis from reality or your lived experience that will be your source of inspiration.

And Fanart is no exception to the rule.

But what is exactly a Fanart?

To this day, no dictionary has released a Fanart definition yet, besides the Wiktionary (oof I know), stating that in the mod usage, a Fanart is an 'Artwork created unofficially by fans of a book, film, etc., and based on it.' The lack of definitions by other sources is probably why we can't all agree on a main consensus.

And here you should've already come up @ me in the comments to give YOUR definition of fanart.

The dark hole emerging from it is that fanart is an artwork, and by definition, an artwork is not merely limited to drawings, but also other forms of Fine art, such as photographs. Any definition of 'artwork' in English includes photographs, and it is the same in my native language. Photography is a form of Fine art and photographs tin can definitely exist artworks.

Then can a photo be a Fanart?

Hum...

Yeah and No?

The problem is, when you say "Fanart", pop believes automatically think about a cartoon and non necessarily about Fine art in general. For this sub-category we should've said 'Fandrawing' or 'Fanillustration'. However, the word 'Fanart' technically does includes all forms of Art: illustrations, animations, photomanipulation, diy'south, sculpture, mode, 3d, etc... as long every bit it'south based on the original content and information technology isn't owned/created by the original artist.

For the photography case, information technology Tin can be a fanart, but most of the time it isn't. If we're talking about photographs from fansites for example, it can't exist considered equally fanarts. Even though Fansites have a 'special' status on the legal side, it is non a content created and based on BTS, but directly taken from it by using their paradigm. There are some cases when a photograph is a fanart but it is really, really rare and well-nigh nonexistent within the BTS fandom.

────────── ·  ·  ·  · ✦

Your platitude example :

Panpan the mushroom is a lensman and equally a fan of BTS, she photographed a scene inspired by a screenshot of the Jump Twenty-four hour period G/V. The persons, background, objects and so on are all dissimilar from the original scene simply the limerick, the positions and the overall result are clearly recalling and referencing the original content. Panpan also explicitly says how her photograph is based on the Bound Twenty-four hours One thousand/V by BTS (BigHit) and claims information technology as fanart.

Result: Panpan'south artistic input on her transformative work has all the rights to call it a fanart and she credited her reference. Past claiming it publicly as a fanart she admits it beingness fancontent, and (kind of) "avoids" plagiarism issues.

────────── ·  ·  ·  · ✦

Too those exceptions, photographs are oft used every bit materials or art tools for photograph manipulation and collages, which tin be considered as 'fanart'.

In this case, they are qualified as 'photomanipulation'/'edits'/'collages', and non every bit drawings/illustrations.

Photograph manips(1, ii, 3) by ☆彡hobi

Another example yous might already know is Obscene crap, who makes BTS and kpop photomanipulations (twt and ig: @obscene_crap) and records her process on her youtube channel (obscene crap).

It may be blurry for your comprehension as to why photo manips can be a fanart, but yous have to sympathise the evolution of the word 'Fanart' over the time. Initially, a fanartist was an artist who is a fan of A GENRE and not a special content. So if you were a fan of the Sci-Fi genre, you would made a fanart, it'south to say a sci-fi artwork because y'all are a fan of this genre. With the appearance of new technologies and computers, the word 'fanart' evolved with new mediums and the opportunity to share easily your artworks. The word fanart is no longer about genres anymore, and with digital fine art many photomanipulations and collages emerged from this wave in the Fanart forms, along with traditional/digital drawings. Information technology so progressively extended to all forms of Art. Thus photomanipulation has played an important role to the fanart development, equally information technology was also seen as a new grade of Art in its evolution.

NB: ARA made several categories for creative fancontents; if you look closely, fashion, diy'southward and more than are listed. Nevertheless, the Fanart section was defined here in ARA as a full general category. If yous fabricated a photomanipulation, I nonetheless recommend to clearly specify the blazon of artwork you made to avoid any trouble. As I said before, no dictionaries as well Wiki officially defined what a Fanart is, and what information technology includes is variable for people because of the lack of definition sources.

Now the important question:

At what indicate is a work considered Simulated Art/Art theft/Plagiarised?

Art theft problems:

Technically, if you lot reupload/use someone'south art without giving credit or even without the due permission, it's basically art theft (unless the work is explicitly claimed with copyleft). It is copyright infringement. That's illegal duh. It's even worse if you claim it every bit yours when it's not, or if y'all sell it.

°50||l°l||l°l||l°l||l°l||50°l||l°l||50°fifty||l°

Example:

(Am I exposing? Yes I am)

The user stole someone's fanart and publicly claimed that she drew it for the challenge. She printed the fanart, cut the borders, sticked information technology, redrew the border and drew over the signature to erase it. She even put a photograph reference as if she fabricated it herself. Tragic.

Original Artist: Kimmy

Twitter: @amidask

Original fanart: https://mobile.twitter.com/amidask/status/914037729498882048

Yous used someone'southward fanart for a derived product (t-shirts, objects, logo) without their permission and without credit? Art theft.

You lot repost a fanart that isn't fabricated by you and you claim it as yours? Art theft.

Yous repost a fanart that isn't yours and you don't give credit? Art theft.

You repost a fanart that isn't yours and you "give credit to the owner" without mentioning the original artist? Art theft.

Yous repost a fanart and requite credit but the artist doesn't allow whatever repost/reupload/use and you haven't got their permission? Art theft.

Currently playing

Salty Potato

2:08 ━━━━◉─────── 4:02

If yous desire to repost someone'south art, there are some rules y'all have to follow. Every artist has their own requirements about reposting. They either allow it, allow it under sure brake, or won't let it at all. Most of the time they would allow it under certain restrictions:

- if they want you to credit them, you should post in the clarification/captions the proper name of the original artist, links to their social media and optionally the link of the original post if you detect information technology.

- if they just let reupload with permission, you have to inquire them personally. If they don't give y'all the permission, just don't do it. They have their reasons.

- if it's not explicitly said if you can reupload their piece of work, you lot shouldn't do it to avoid any legal issues. Effort to inquire them, just if they don't answer you should give up.

Actually, don't reupload whatsoever of their content if y'all are not sure you have 100% the right to do it.

If you don't know the original artist:

You may accept plant a pretty fanart on PiNtErEsT or Google and you desire to repost this cool pic. Unfortunately, yous don't know who is the original creative person. Yous tin apply the epitome reverse search feature via Google epitome if you're working with a computer, or via these sites: Prepostseo, Tineye or Reverse photos. Apps like Veracity can practise this as well.

Plagiarism bug:

(Fanart case)

Copying/tracing another fanart, posting it without their permission and/or not giving credit to the original artist. + a bonus if you say that you 100% drew it past yourself. Liars.

- Copying/tracing a fanart -

Copying/tracing a fanart is ok if y'all keep information technology for yourself. Young people do it a lot. What is a large No-no is to post it without crediting the artist or without their permission. Don't do it, even if you're young. This is disrespectful, you really steal someone's idea by giving no credit to the original artist. This, is called Plagiarism and it'south basically a class of Fine art theft.

Examples:

Copied from

Original artist: 도나

Twitter: @ans60677

Original fanart: https://mobile.twitter.com/ans60677/status/790209753737592832

- Tracing in general over a photograph -

As I said before, it'southward fine to trace. A detail. Maybe a bit more than. But if an artwork is heavily traced, it can become a problem.

I don't accept annihilation against tracing, of grade it tin can be a method to Acquire proportions, features, etc Simply it'due south so easy to make a fanart using tracing when people work SO Hard to produce an artwork. Though I know that they at to the lowest degree put effort on the shading and some details and then I appreciate their personal efforts. If your work is heavily traced/referenced on a photo, y'all should credit the photographer, or at least show the photo reference. They deserve respect also and without them your piece of work wouldn't even exist.

Minor Recap:

- It's fine to repost someone's Fine art IF they permit you to do so and if you give them proper credit.

- It's fine to copy someone'due south Fine art IF you give them proper credit, or if you don't postal service it at all lol. You lot should ask the original artist'southward permission if it'south possible of form.

Fake Art issues:

The worst.

I wouldn't put Fake Art in the aforementioned category of the two others. Here the main factor isn't the source of the content, only rather its nature.

Imitation art technically doesn't exist, but what nosotros phone call fake is the way the 'creative person' put their work in a specific course of Art when it isn't. BIG. LIARS. The nigh frequent case you might accept already seen is people who merits their photo manips as real drawings drawn from scratch.

Respect people, be honest.

Do yous know that with the time spent to make upwardly this and your non existent story, you could take improved and do something personal from your ain efforts?

Examples:

*triggered*

boo boo the fools

The background is still here

ngl I experience sad she ruined the photo with her "messy strokes"

Proof that there is 0 cognition about the grid process

reference pic partially erased and printed to get in look similar a wip

"final result" thanks to 3 LiNeS, with the same uncontrolled brush strokes

the background of the reference is all the same here + inconsistency of the hair vs body features

does this even count every bit a proof

made with the Alive Portrait Maker app

filtered photograph

I'M Deplorable BUT Not SORRY??? I plainly know how they fabricated information technology, I obviously know they don't have actual wips of their work considering it'south a photo/a filter/an app. Faux FANARTISTS ARE THE WORST BECAUSE Non Simply THEY ARE LYING TO EVERYONE, Only THEY'RE ALSO GETTING PRAISE WHEN THEY DON'T DESERVE ANY ATTENTION. They're one of the reasons why digital art can take a bad reputation, especially to Photorealism artists (simply traditional fine art tin be concerned besides). I recommend to EVERY user to be aware of these, considering it's really a problem and it's as bad (if non worse) every bit fine art thieves. Letting them exercise anything they desire is like letting them boom every creative person's credibility and trust.

Photomanips are photomanips

Drawings are drawings

Photographs are photographs

Collages are collages

And this is fine.

Claiming that a photomanipulation is a drawing makes it faux. They merely had 1 job: being honest. Sadly they failed.

The affair is, if you're non accustomed to it, you can be wronged. Everyone can exist fooled. Some of them have fifty-fifty been featured. The worst case would be that you charge someone of fake art when they really didn't do information technology.

If something looks off, follow your doubts only discretely. You totally take the right to enquire (politely) how they did information technology. A honest artist wouldn't heed it at all and their explication should follow a logical and realistic method.

Furthermore the finished piece isn't the only matter you should look at: usually, the nearly important departure between real illustrators/drawers and simulated ones is the WIP, and their other works. I'm not proverb that the presence of wips would be a proof that makes a fanart real, not at all, merely rather how they did information technology.

So what tin you lot practise?

You're not a kid anymore. If y'all want to make ARA meliorate, you accept to make the change happen by yourself. Everyone here is a fellow member of this community, and so EVERYONE is concerned. What I usually meet is how people complain about a state of affairs but never do anything. This can remind the Bystander effect. You lot all keep watching, complaining, simply by a diffusion of responsibility you deny the situation'due south severity, because you are waiting for someone to deed and in the end no one really does since you lot're waiting for each other to exercise information technology.

The C/L team is here to moderate the community, they're non team Amino, they are not here 24/7 to take your manus and expect manually at all the posts/chats that are potentially problematic. First of all, they tin't because they're humans, and secondly the community itself should be able to decide their goals and the environment they want to live in (as long as the Amino app allows it, may I accept to remind you that by installing the app you agreed on the conditions of utilisation and terms of service yous didn't read). You are independant. Yous all accept a flagging/report feature AND YOU SHOULD USE It Because Y'all ARE SUPPOSED TO Do It.

Therefore the fundamental word to help is:

Report

JUST. Study. THESE. FAKERS. Nosotros. DON'T. Need. TOXICITY.

Art theft? Kindly REPORT.

Plagiarism?(Articles, blogs, Art, etc.) REPORT.

Looking for Fanboy/Gf/Bf/Spam/Daddy chats? Report.

False Art? Written report Study REPORT.

Concerning fake art cases:

Request the users politely is recommended, just y'all'll most likely get any result and information technology's dangerous if y'all practice it repeatedly. Call up that you can be banned for harassment and information technology'due south piece of cake to report you. I suggest to directly study them to the Curation/Leader Team once you're certain it'south Fine art theft/Fake Art and ask for a deep inlook, with proofs and screenshots.

I listed in the Resource department some amino blogs related to the topic, if you're interested in how to recognise several forms of Art theft, legislation of fanart in general, crediting properly or even more discussions about it, delight experience free to read them.

Resources

Web:

-What's Art? What's Beauty? in Philosophy Now

-Fanart lore in Wiki

Amino:

-Legality of Fan Art, Fiction, Gifs and Merch written by Cristal_Green

-Fine art Theft 101 written by Minty

-Colored-Over Or Filtered Fanart and The Repercussions of Not Properly Crediting written by Rea

Side Note:

The identity of all of the users depicted hither in the examples is hidden. I have nothing against them personally and I wish them all the all-time to starting time a new. Anybody deserves a 2nd chance and beingness ambitious towards people who make mistakes is (plain) not a solution. Nearly of the people who repost someone'due south fine art without explicit credits are often ignorant and young, recall of the children and show them the correct way.

Sincerely yours,

Potato

PS: Stream Run.

Edit (December 24th, 2018) - typos

+ Aaah jdjsbsjsjs thanks so much for the feature :sob: :sob: :sob: my heart is so flustered woah svsvsbsjsjj cheers for the feature, cheers to everyone who reads the weblog, I'm lamentable it's very long and not everyone wants to read this just I volition always thank you for your fourth dimension and your comments :pensive: :two_hearts: Your appreciation is really motivating and I hope that y'all're having an astonishing Christmas/christmas Eve :sparkling_heart: :sparkling_heart: :sparkling_heart: Murphy loves you and I promise you're enjoying your beautiful moments with people you cherish. If not, thinking about them is plenty :tired_face: Merry Christmas! :purple_heart: :purple_heart: :purple_heart:

clarkenur1971.blogspot.com

Source: https://aminoapps.com/c/btsarmy/page/blog/d-o-fake-art-art-theft-co/06M1_g63UkuJjp800dNjd1WbMEanGPp5Exn

Share this post